Skip to content

Platform

Compliance evidence that comes from your systems, not your spreadsheets

GRC 360 Assure consolidates policy, risk, compliance mapping, audit evidence and vendor oversight into one platform - deployed inside your own environment, where your data stays.

In short

GRC 360 Assure is an on-premise governance, risk and compliance platform. It holds policy management, risk management, compliance mapping, audit automation and vendor oversight in one place, so a control mapped once is reused across every framework that asks for it. Deployment typically takes 2 to 4 weeks, and compliance data never leaves your environment.

The problem

The gap is between what the policy says and what the estate does

GovAssure, the NCSC Cyber Assessment Framework, DORA and the EU AI Act all now want technical evidence rather than an assertion that a control exists. Meanwhile legacy infrastructure and unmanaged AI adoption move faster than any policy cycle, and primes carry legal responsibility for Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers they cannot see.

Spreadsheets and disconnected tools were adequate when compliance was a document exercise. They are not adequate when the question is whether a control is actually operating this morning.

The usual approach

  • Process-heavy, with real time spent on coordination, reporting and manual chasing across stakeholders
  • Broad but shallow: many requirements captured on paper, without the technical depth to verify implementation
  • Evidence assembled for the audit rather than produced by the operation, so posture does not improve between audits
  • Slow to absorb change, which is a problem when systems, threats and regulation all move faster than the review cycle

How this differs

  • Engineering-led, combining security, architecture and implementation rather than treating GRC as a reporting layer
  • Requirements connected directly to infrastructure, applications and workflows, so assurance is continuous rather than periodic
  • Policy translated into concrete controls across real systems, teams and environments
  • Evidence that stands up in operations and in the audit, because it is the same evidence

What it does

Five things, in one place

The value is not any single module. It is that a control mapped once is reused everywhere it is asked for, which is where the duplicated effort in multi-framework compliance actually lives.

  • 01

    Policy management

    Centralised policy storage with version control, approval workflow and automated employee attestation, so the current version is the one people have actually signed.

  • 02

    Risk management

    Real-time dashboards, automated mitigation workflows and predictive risk scoring, so an emerging risk surfaces before it becomes an incident.

  • 03

    Compliance mapping

    Map a control once and reuse it across ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA, GDPR and others. The duplicate evidence-gathering that makes multi-framework compliance expensive largely disappears.

  • 04

    Audit automation

    Automated evidence collection, scheduling and audit-ready analytics, so preparation stops being a quarter-long scramble by the same three people.

  • 05

    Vendor management

    Automated due diligence, supplier scorecards and root cause analysis, giving third-party oversight that survives contact with a real supply chain.

Deployment

Built for environments where the data cannot leave

A SaaS GRC tool that holds your compliance evidence in someone else’s environment is, for a number of organisations, a finding in its own right. This one deploys inside yours.

Fully on-premise
Deployed inside your environment. Data does not leave it, which is what makes the platform usable where sovereignty is a contractual requirement rather than a preference.
AES-256 and TLS 1.2/1.3
Encryption at rest and in transit, with role-based access control restricting what each user can reach.
RESTful integration
Connects to ERP, HRMS, SIEM and Active Directory, so evidence is pulled from the systems of record rather than re-entered by hand.
Modest footprint
Runs on a 4-core server with 8GB RAM and 200GB of disk. It does not need its own infrastructure programme to exist.

2 to 4 weeks

typical deployment. Configuration is drag and drop rather than a coding project, which is what keeps deployment in weeks rather than quarters.

Audit-time and cost-saving figuresmeasurement method and source · Q30

The honest part

The platform is the easier half

Software does not know which controls matter in your estate, which evidence your auditor will accept, or which of your suppliers can actually reach your network. A GRC platform deployed without that knowledge becomes a very organised record of the wrong things.

Cloudgap deploys it, maps your controls into it, and runs the assurance around it. If you already have a GRC platform you are happy with, say so - the assessment and vCISO work stands on its own and we would rather do that than sell you a second tool.

FAQ

About the platform

What is GRC 360 Assure?

GRC 360 Assure is a governance, risk and compliance platform deployed on-premise or in your own cloud tenancy. It consolidates policy management, risk management, compliance mapping, audit evidence and vendor oversight into one system, so that a control mapped once can be reused across ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA, GDPR and other frameworks rather than evidenced separately for each.

Where does the data live?

Inside your environment. The platform is deployed on-premise or into your own cloud tenancy, and compliance data does not leave it. That is the difference that matters for organisations under data sovereignty obligations, where a SaaS GRC tool holding evidence in a third-party environment is itself a finding.

How long does deployment take?

Typically 2 to 4 weeks. Configuration is drag and drop rather than a development project, which is what keeps the timeline in weeks. It runs on modest infrastructure - a four-core server with 8GB of RAM and 200GB of disk - so it does not require its own hardware programme before it can be useful.

What does it integrate with?

ERP, HRMS, SIEM and Active Directory through RESTful APIs. The point of the integration is that evidence is pulled from the systems of record rather than re-keyed by a person into a compliance tool, which is where both the cost and the errors in traditional GRC come from.

Is this a tool or a service?

Both, and the platform on its own is the less useful half. Software does not know which controls matter in your environment or which evidence an auditor will accept. Cloudgap deploys the platform, maps your controls into it, and runs the assurance around it - which is the part that turns a licence into an audit you pass.